unav-devs team mailing list archive

[Costales <costales@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I have a mockup in mind that should fix everything :) Give me time please
:P We'll look in this after 0.60 :))


-- 
Sent using Dekko from my Ubuntu device

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Nekhelesh Ramananthan <
krnekhelesh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Coherent means logical, consistent and orderly. It is correct to say that
> the uNav UI is definitely beautiful and orderly. However it is *not*
> logical :) (proven by my analysis of the nearby and share menu items).
> However I agree that we shouldn't rush this. Let's look at some mockups and
> then decide which one to go with.
>
> I also agree to releasing 0.59 ASAP and then focusing on usability
> improvements in 0.60.
>
> @Marcos, I would still really like to hear your feedback on the NearBy and
> Share button in the route page. Do you see any use for it? Rest assured,
> even if you say it can be removed, we will do it only in 0.60 ;). Clearly
> me and Joerg are of the opinion that it is useless when you can access them
> straight from the POI popup.
>
> Cheers,
> Nekhelesh
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Costales <costales@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi :)
>>
>> IMHO the current uNav UI is great now because it's so coherent. And this
>> is so important.
>> Could we improve the current usability? Let's do it, no problem :) But
>> please take it easy, there is not a real hurry.
>>
>> What do you think before to change code or layouts, to considerate
>> mockups. This will give us the big picture, that is need in this case and
>> avoid work 2 times (now and in the future).
>>
>> What do you think about to release 0.59 ASAP and then, focus usability
>> improvements in the 0.60?
>>
>> A hug :)
>>
>> --
>> Sent using Dekko from my Ubuntu device
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Nekhelesh Ramananthan <
>> krnekhelesh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Joerg,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Joerg Berroth <joergberroth@xxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey just saw that almost all things I described are already put into
>>>> discussion/fixing. Great.
>>>>
>>>> 1. I agree to nik, and want to add, that we should work on getting
>>>> things as clear as possible, so that in general no welcome wizard is
>>>> needed. Of course, the wizard is an additional great to have.
>>>>
>>>
>>> For your information, it was I who developed the welcome wizard that
>>> uNav borrowed from Podbird :). When I first implemented it, my intention
>>> was to basically welcome the user and briefly show a list of the features
>>> that an app provides. It was *never* meant to be a training wizard. That
>>> said, I don't see why we should not have a welcome wizard for uNav. It is a
>>> good presentation and eases the user into uNav.
>>>
>>> However a user will not necessarily remember every little thing he
>>> reads/saw in the welcome wizard. The feature definitely needs to be more
>>> easier to use. Just how is the question we are battling now.
>>>
>>> I am not fully sold on the idea of using the bottom edge since we use it
>>> in the navigation mode. I feel it might confuse a user on what the bottom
>>> edge does at different times of using the app.
>>>
>>> Just curious, why dont we just show the "search" icon in the header
>>> alongside the 4 header icons we already have? After you're right, the
>>> search option is the most important way to search a route which is what
>>> everyone uses uNav for. Making it available in the main header provides a
>>> fast/quick access to it. Simple. No need for additonal menus or options.
>>> Clicking the search button opens the search page we already have now.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Nekhelesh
>>>
>>>
>>
>