linaro-infrastructure-stakeholders team mailing list archive

[Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:17:08PM -0400, James Westby wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 18:16:52 -0700, Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So, one thing that's upcoming and that we're going to need some time from IS
> > for is provisioning builders for, and help with bootstrapping, an armhf
> > port.  We don't have the hardware secured for this just yet so it would be
> > premature to propose work on this for April, but I guess IS will want to
> > know this is coming.

> Thanks for letting me know. I'll put it in to consideration, and ensure
> that IS know that it is on the way.

> I believe that you've already had some discussions with at least Lamont
> about this? Could you summarise those briefly for me?

So far I've discussed buildd capacity with LaMont, but not the question of
armhf bring-up.  On the buildd side, Loïc is trying to secure 10 more panda
boards to help cover the needs of armel archive + armel ppas + armhf
archive, but those won't actually be needed until both the daughterboard for
the ppa builders, and the armhf port, are in place.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@xxxxxxxxxx                                     vorlon@xxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature