linaro-infrastructure-stakeholders team mailing list archive
-
linaro-infrastructure-stakeholders team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00059
Re: Infrastructure proposals for April
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:13:11PM -0400, James Westby wrote:
> We have a stakeholders meeting on Thursday next week.
> If you have a project that you would like us to consider at that meeting
> then please reply to this mail and let us know. You can also take this
> time to re-emphasise your priorities if the projects already appear on
> https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/CurrentProjects
> Your input is vital to make sure that we can address your needs.
> As a change for this month we are going to start including items that
> will be handled by Canonical IS explicitly in this process. There are
> several reasons for this, including the fact that I am the designated
> contact point for that, that we need to balance the priorities across
> the organisation there as well, and that frequently projects will span
> the two teams, so it should be easier for you to just work with us for
> any project like that.
> This means that if you have projects you want IS to work on, RT tickets
> that are important to you and not being looked at, or something that you
> want to get some more information on please also reply to this email. I
> will be using this information when prioritising tasks with IS.
So, one thing that's upcoming and that we're going to need some time from IS
for is provisioning builders for, and help with bootstrapping, an armhf
port. We don't have the hardware secured for this just yet so it would be
premature to propose work on this for April, but I guess IS will want to
know this is coming.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@xxxxxxxxxx vorlon@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Follow ups
References