webbrowser-app team mailing list archive

[Vincent JOBARD <vinzjobard@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Lars,

in fact I'm talking to have the same webbrowser apps (webapps runtime &
webpage browser) for Ubuntu Touch and Ubuntu Desktop.

I recognize that the debat FF/Chromium is more complicated than Mozilla VS
Google. In fact it is webkit (Blink) VS Xul Runner. But it could be great
to have the same default apps in Touch and Desktop. And to be able to sync
the webpage we are seeing between the form factor using Ubuntu one

BR

Vincent JOBARD
http://aliaz.com/winael


2013/6/18 Lars Knudsen <larsgk@xxxxxxxxx>

> Hi Vincent,
>
> I think snowshoe with qtwebkit has been chosen for Ubuntu Mobile.  This is
> based on WebKit2 and should be a good compromise between speed and features
> - both regarding HTML5 capabilities and the possibility to embed qtwebkit
> as a webview in your own app.  Currently, there is no other web engine and
> port  (that I know of) that is equally easy to use and integrate.  Maybe
> WebKitNix could be an option if Ubuntu wants to stick with WebKit - or some
> dedicated Blink port could make sense to follow the Google path (which
> could make sense - as WebKit seems to be going into "maintenance mode" and
> Blink might be the new fast running train with MANY big supporters).
>
> Firefox is nice - but doesn't have a lot of industry backing - meaning
> that especially WebApps tweaked for Chrome (now WebKit - soon Blink) or
> iOS/Safari (WebKit) would probably not work 100% the same on a FF platform.
>  Lets see if the FF device to be launched will give FF some more wind under
> its wings.  Right now, there is no big "vessel" (iOS, Android, other
> devices...) carrying FF as the primary choice - so choosing FF would
> probably be a choice based on feelings more than anything (probably calling
> a lot of flames toward me now ;)).
>
> When you talk about "a real Ubuntu WebBrowser" - are you talking about the
> "webapps runtime" part - or the "browse web pages" part (or both)?
>
> TL;DR If Ubuntu went and did an own port - it would make sense to use
> Blink (IMO) - until then, it makes sense to stick with Snowshoe/QtWebKit2
>
> br
> Lars
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Vincent JOBARD <vinzjobard@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Hi every one,
>>
>> Since few days the debat is restarted between Chromium or Firefox as the
>> default Web browser for Saucy.
>>
>> But testing Webbrowser-App on my desktop, I said to my self, maybe the
>> answer is to have a real Ubuntu Webbrowser, the Ubuntu Touch Webbrowser for
>> all form factor in ubuntu family. I hope for the 14.04 LTS.
>>
>> So this is some ideas that could be great to be added in webbrowser-app :
>>
>> - An icone to show/hide the bottom edge menu, that can be call by a
>> keystroke
>> - Implement the common keystroke (like <Ctrl> L)
>> - HUD support
>> - The 2-fingers tap
>>
>> I love the way that Webbrowser-app show only the webpage in big on my
>> little netbook screen
>>
>> Thx in advance guys
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Winael
>> http://aliaz.com/winael
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~webbrowser-app
>> Post to     : webbrowser-app@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~webbrowser-app
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>