ubuntu-mips team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-mips team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00017
Re: n32 vs n64 - should we forego n32 and wait until the Debian n64 base system is made?
Hi everyone,
> I am sorry to let you wait so long for a real job here. I think we all
> should agree on where should we start, eg. o32, n32 or n64, and so on.
> Also, I am preparing the following things:
> 1. Two more people have made the Debian n32 base system working in
> my team are still on vacation. They will be ready very soon (about
> several days).
From previous discussions, it seems that the agreed way is:
- n64 kernel
- n32 userland
- plus n64:
- glibc
- library and runtimes of other programming languages (such as
python, ruby, haskell, Java),
- blas and other libraries that are likely to be used by programs
requiring > 4GB memory.
And given that the Debian team has already got the n32 base system
working, should be easy for us to use that to bootstrap to Ubuntu, but
Michael wants n64 kernel (to support >4GB of global address space),
would it be easy to compile an n64 Ubuntu kernel?
> 4. I and other persons (methoned in 1) are working on the ubuntu mips
> n32 base system working. So everyone in our team could login into the
> system to work on it.
Is this the way to go?
Kaicheung
Follow ups
References