ubuntu-mips team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-mips team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00007
Re: n32 vs n64 - should we forego n32 and wait until the Debian n64 base system is made?
However, will an user-space application that consume > 4GB memory be
able to run on an OS with n32 userland and n64 kernel?
Kaicheung
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Michael
Casadevall<sonicmctails@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> (apologizes in advance for not responding, I accidentally was not
> subscribed to the list)
>
> An n64 userland is not desirable for a few reasons, the best setup
> would be a n32 userland with n64 kernel, with specific optimizations
> for anything that can truly benefit from the 64-bit userland. For the
> vast majority of apps, 64-bits will not increase performance, and due
> to the larger instruction size, reduce the amount of cache available,
> actually degrading performance vs. a 32-bit userland. However, a
> 64-bit kernel will allow a process to break the 4GiB memory barrier,
> as well as allowing the userland to execute n64 applications.
>
> (w.r.t. to i386/x86_64, AMD added more registers when they revamped
> the instruction set, from 4 to 16, hence why despite the above, there
> is a general performance increase when going from 32-bit to 64-bit).
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mips
> Post to : ubuntu-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mips
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References