genesis-devs team mailing list archive
-
genesis-devs team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00013
Re: Account management [was: gtk.Builder migration]
Hi again!
> But do we really have to disable accounts in a way that SE understands?
> Currently, when there is more than one server configured, Genesis looks
> for the 'default_server' property in the genesis.ini. Maybe we could
> expand this to contain a list, not only a single item. Then Genesis
> could regard accounts in that list as enabled, and absent ones as
> disabled.
I do not think there is a problem with the accounts, but with their
origins. I don't like the solution to avoid account synchronization
from our configuration file, because in that case Genesis would be
something more than a SE frontend, and I think it's not desirable.
What about if the user use another frontend after using Genesis?, the
account will be enabled in that case.
> But it might be useful to be able to disable an account (so it is not
> included in the automatic sync), but sync it manually from the account
> manager. So I think it would be useful to have a means of disabling
> accounts other than deleting them.
Mmm, I think you're right. Another option would be to store the in the
config the sources marked as synchronized before the user disabled the
account. Thus if the user wants to enable it again, we will be able to
remember them. I think it's less instrusive. What do you think? SE
should provide this functionality, but it might work for now.
> BTW, I just made that icon theme stuff, so current trunk does now
> respect the icon theme for the display of the status icon. I just want
> to give the icons some more polish. Then I plan to release a 0.4.2. That
> will not contain really huge changes, I just wanted to push out a
> release for Karmic. I guess I could also include your
> desactivate_origins branch, that shouldn’t be too risky.
Oks, I've not had time to test it, but I could try to test it this week.
> After the release, I’ll merge the gtkbuilder branch (If you didn’t find
> any problems with my changes), and we can start preparing the more
> fundamental changes.
It still lacks some work, but probably in two or three weekends would be ready.
Good night, cheers!!! :-)
Follow ups
References