canonical-server team mailing list archive

1. canonical-server team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the canonical-server mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Martin Pitt, 2009-05-05
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Dewey_Oxberger, 2009-05-06
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Martin Pitt, 2009-05-06
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Dewey_Oxberger, 2009-05-06
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Dewey_Oxberger, 2009-05-07
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-05-07
• Re: [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Mario Limonciello, 2009-05-07
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Steve Langasek, 2009-05-07
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: laga, 2009-05-07
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: DAP, 2009-05-07
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Dewey_Oxberger, 2009-05-08
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Dewey_Oxberger, 2009-05-08
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Blackpaw, 2009-05-09
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: DAP, 2009-05-09
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Will Uther, 2009-05-11
• Re: [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-05-11
• Re: [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Will Uther, 2009-05-12
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Mario Limonciello, 2009-05-11
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-05-12
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-05-12
• Re: [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Mario Limonciello, 2009-05-12
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Will Uther, 2009-05-12
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: MarcRandolph, 2009-05-12
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Will Uther, 2009-05-12
• [Bug 326768] Re: mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-05-12
• [Bug 326768] [NEW] mysqld_safe thinks mysqld has crashed when it hasn't
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2009-05-05
• [Bug 261026] Re: exim4 install fails with error: incompatible command-line options
  From: Martin Pitt, 2009-04-15
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 261026] Re: exim4 install fails with error: incompatible command-line options
  From: Martin Pitt, 2009-04-15
• [Bug 261026] Re: exim4 install fails with error: incompatible command-line options
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2009-04-20
• [Bug 261026] [NEW] exim4 install fails with error: incompatible command-line options
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2009-04-15
• [Bug 342239] Re: vmbuilder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Jamie Strandboge, 2009-04-10
• [Bug 333311] Re: Raid 10 always starts up as degraded
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-25
• [Bug 347747] Re: mdadm crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-25
• [Bug 337763] Re: [jaunty] regression: virt-manager reboot action is non-functional
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 337763] Re: [jaunty] regression: virt-manager reboot action is non-functional
  From: Rick Clark, 2009-04-03
• [Bug 337763] [NEW] [jaunty] regression: virt-manager reboot action is non-functional
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2009-03-23
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-03-23
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-03-23
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Andy Whitcroft, 2009-03-24
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Andy Whitcroft, 2009-03-25
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Andy Whitcroft, 2009-03-25
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Steve Langasek, 2009-03-26
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-03-27
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Andy Whitcroft, 2009-03-27
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-03-27
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Andy Whitcroft, 2009-03-28
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Andy Whitcroft, 2009-04-03
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2009-04-03
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: "infogerance" (Rakotomandimby Mihamina), 2009-05-22
• [Bug 334994] Re: Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: "infogerance" (Rakotomandimby Mihamina), 2009-05-22
• [Bug 334994] [NEW] Degraded RAID boot fails: kobject_add_internal failed for dev-sda1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2009-03-23
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-24
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: Leszek 'skolima' Ciesielski, 2009-03-24
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-25
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: LCID Fire, 2009-03-25
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-26
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-26
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: LCID Fire, 2009-03-26
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: Jack Wasey, 2009-03-26
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: LCID Fire, 2009-03-26
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: Steve Langasek, 2009-03-27
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-27
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: Steve Langasek, 2009-03-27
• Re: [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-03-27
• [Bug 316670] Re: Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-03-27
• [Bug 316670] [NEW] Raid10 array not assembled at boot, all disks are marked as spare
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2009-03-23
• [Bug 342359] Re: [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 342359] Re: [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Jamie Strandboge, 2009-03-24
• [Bug 342359] Re: [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Jamie Strandboge, 2009-03-24
• [Bug 342359] Re: [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Jamie Strandboge, 2009-03-24
• [Bug 342359] Re: [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Jamie Strandboge, 2009-03-24
• [Bug 342359] Re: [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Jamie Strandboge, 2009-03-24
• [Bug 342359] Re: [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Jamie Strandboge, 2009-03-24
• [Bug 342359] Re: [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Jamie Strandboge, 2009-03-27
• [Bug 342359] Re: [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Bryan McLellan, 2009-04-03
• [Bug 342359] Re: [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Jamie Strandboge, 2009-04-09
• [Bug 342359] Re: [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Brandon Konkle, 2009-04-09
• [Bug 342359] Re: [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Steve Langasek, 2009-04-10
• [Bug 342359] Re: [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Jamie Strandboge, 2009-04-10
• [Bug 342359] [NEW] [jaunty] ubuntu-vm-builder crashed with ioctl in create()
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2009-03-23
• [Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
  From: Marc Deslauriers, 2009-03-22
• [Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-03-27
• [Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-03-27
• [Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2009-03-27
• [Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
  From: Veloce, 2009-05-07
• [Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
  From: Dan Hatch, 2009-05-09
• [Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
  From: Jim Howell, 2009-05-13
• [Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
  From: Peter Triesz, 2009-06-04
• [Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
  From: Peter Triesz, 2009-06-04
• [Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
  From: Jim Howell, 2009-06-04
• [Bug 344400] Re: libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
  From: Peter Triesz, 2009-06-05
• [Bug 344400] [NEW] libvirtError: internal error unable to start guest
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2009-03-20
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Brazen, 2009-03-20
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Soren Hansen, 2009-03-20
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Jamin W. Collins, 2009-03-21
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Steve Beattie, 2009-03-23
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-03-26
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Jamin W. Collins, 2009-03-31
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-03-31
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: gernonimo, 2009-03-31
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: danielk, 2009-04-01
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-04-01
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-04-01
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-04-01
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-04-01
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-04-02
• [Bug 331128] Re: virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2009-04-02
• [Bug 331128] [NEW] virtio on hardy guest and jaunty host (kvm 84) is broken
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2009-03-20
• [Bug 113899] Re: ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet
  From: Kees Cook, 2009-01-23
• [Bug 68818] Re: squid transparent proxy is broken
  From: sadeeb, 2009-01-20
• Re: [Bug 68818] Re: squid transparent proxy is broken
  From: Martin Pitt, 2009-01-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 68818] Re: squid transparent proxy is broken
  From: Francesco Chemolli, 2009-01-20
• Invitation to canonical-server accepted by soren
  From: Canonical Ubuntu Platform, 2009-01-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Invitation to canonical-server accepted by soren
  From: Canonical Server Team (private), 2009-05-13
• [Bug 290401] Re: P3: [cman] after ran the command fence_tool dump, the fenced process will take 100% CPU usage
  From: Shang Wu, 2008-10-30
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 290401] Re: P3: [cman] after ran the command fence_tool dump, the fenced process will take 100% CPU usage
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2008-11-07
• [Bug 290401] Re: P3: [cman] after ran the command fence_tool dump, the fenced process will take 100% CPU usage
  From: Shang Wu, 2008-11-14
• [Bug 290401] Re: P3: [cman] after ran the command fence_tool dump, the fenced process will take 100% CPU usage
  From: Steve Langasek, 2009-02-19
• [Bug 290401] Re: P3: [cman] after ran the command fence_tool dump, the fenced process will take 100% CPU usage
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2009-02-23
• [Bug 290401] Re: P3: [cman] after ran the command fence_tool dump, the fenced process will take 100% CPU usage
  From: Fabián Rodríguez, 2009-04-01
• [Bug 290401] Re: P3: [cman] after ran the command fence_tool dump, the fenced process will take 100% CPU usage
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2009-06-17
• [Bug 290401] [NEW] P3: [cman] after ran the command fence_tool dump, the fenced process will take 100% CPU usage
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2008-10-30
• [Bug 181948] Re: exiqgrep: error on messages w/o size
  From: Bryce Harrington, 2008-10-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 181948] Re: exiqgrep: error on messages w/o size
  From: Bryce Harrington, 2009-01-06
• [Bug 181948] Re: exiqgrep: error on messages w/o size
  From: Daniel Holbach, 2009-01-07
• [Bug 181948] Re: exiqgrep: error on messages w/o size
  From: Daniel Holbach, 2009-01-07
• [Bug 181948] Re: exiqgrep: error on messages w/o size
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-02-11
• [Bug 181948] Re: exiqgrep: error on messages w/o size
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-02-11
• [Bug 181948] Re: exiqgrep: error on messages w/o size
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2009-02-12
• [Bug 181948] Re: exiqgrep: error on messages w/o size
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2009-05-14
• [Bug 181948] Re: exiqgrep: error on messages w/o size
  From: Daniel van Eeden, 2009-05-15
• [Bug 181948] Re: exiqgrep: error on messages w/o size
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2009-05-16
• [Bug 249938] Re: P3: Hardy slapd server is not supporting sasl/external authentication
  From: Henrik Nilsen Omma, 2008-07-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 249938] Re: P3: Hardy slapd server is not supporting sasl/external authentication
  From: Dragomir Minkovski, 2008-08-27
• [Bug 249938] Re: P3: Hardy slapd server is not supporting sasl/external authentication
  From: Mathias Gug, 2008-09-02
• [Bug 249938] Re: P3: Hardy slapd server is not supporting sasl/external authentication
  From: Dragomir Minkovski, 2008-09-25
• [Bug 249938] [NEW] P3: Hardy slapd server is not supporting sasl/external authentication
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2008-07-23
• [ACTIVITY] 23 Jun - 4 Jul
  From: Dustin Kirkland, 2008-07-07
• [ACTIVITY] Jun-30 to Jul-7
  From: Chuck Short, 2008-07-07
• [ACTIVITY] Jun 30 - Jul 6 for Jamie Strandboge
  From: Jamie Strandboge, 2008-07-07
• [Bug 164837] Re: Dovecot SASL for postfix
  From: Ante Karamatić, 2008-06-24
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 164837] Re: Dovecot SASL for postfix
  From: Ante Karamatić, 2009-02-11
• [Bug 164837] Re: Dovecot SASL for postfix
  From: Mathias Gug, 2009-02-11
• [Bug 164837] Re: Dovecot SASL for postfix
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2009-02-13

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2011 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  System status