ubuntu-mips team mailing list archive

[LIU Qi <liuqi82@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 02:06:32PM +1200, Kai-Cheung Leung wrote:
 > However there are many applications , like what you said - database
 > servers, and an increasing number scientific modelling (such as
 > octave, scilab, matlab etc), datamining and bioinformatics
 > applications that can very easily take > 4GB!!!  And these
 > applications are the ones which are likely to run on clusters, or
 > GRID, of loongson multicore boxes.  Loongson is targetting very
 > heavily on these scientific / engineering markets.
I am sorry for the late response. I am getting really busy these days. I
agree with Michael. 64-bit kernel with n32 userland will be good enough.
These programs including scientific, database applications are corner
cases. If someone really needs, we or they could compile a n64 version
and the n64 program also runs on our platform.
 > 
 > Suppoose if the system has n64 kernel and it has both n32 and n64
 > glibc, then would it be possible for n32 and n64 applications to
 > co-exist?  In this case, applications that may need more than 4G can
 > compile with n64 and link to the n64 glibc (and other n64 libraries)
Yes, that is possible. And for now the Debian mips o32 port indeed has
n32 libraries, such as glibc and so on.

 > In this case, it would be difficult to maintain n32 and n64 versions
 > of *all* libraries in the repository!
I don't think so. Only the really necessary packages will be maintained
with two ABI.
 > 
 > If n32 and n64 cannot coexist easily, then perhaps we can make them
 > separately.  n32 for netbook and desktop, n64 for supercomputing.  As
 > they are for different markets.  However do you think we are asking
 > Canonical for too much to maintain both n32 and n64?
Just n32, I think.

 > 
 > If you think the last option is feasible, then once the Chinese
 > students have made the Debian base port, we can immediately roll out
 > our Ubuntu n32 for the netbook / desktop market.
 > 
 > However to target the database server and supercomputing markets, we
 > still need to port Ubuntu to n64.
 > 
 > What do you guys think?
I agree with Michael on this issue: we should start from mipsel n32 port
since its good performance and the unnecessity of mips n64 port. The n32
is just good enough, I think.

Kai-Cheung: What do you still worry about? Let us discuss more on that.

-- 
 LIU Qi

 liuqi82@xxxxxxxxx
 liuqi@xxxxxxxxxx

 PGP Key fingerprint:
  A8C0 860C D8A9 D6FC 551F
  6E2C A4AB 763B 00EC 886F