ubuntu-bacula team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

[Bug 372328] Re: Bacula has no encryption support in bacula-sd-sqlite3

To: ubuntu-bacula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Steven Susbauer <steven@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 01:07:09 -0000
Reply-to: Bug 372328 <372328@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

I can confirm that SSL support is disabled as of bacula 2.2.0-1. It is
documented in the NEWS.Debian and README.Debian, and their reason is at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/07/msg00144.html

It appears to be a licensing issue, and how Debian interprets the GPL
(vs Red Hat and such which still have the feature).

** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
Bacula has no encryption support in bacula-sd-sqlite3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372328
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bacula, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu.

Status in “bacula” source package in Ubuntu: Confirmed

Bug description:
Bacula has encryption support via the storage daemon bacula-sd, however this has not been compiled into the sqlite3 version.

Is there any particular reason it is not compiled in?

This issue existed in 8.04 (hence: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/38181) and also exists in 9.04, which prompted my report.