linaro-infrastructure-stakeholders team mailing list archive

[Guilherme Salgado <salgado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 09:56 +0100, Stephen Doel wrote:
> Very good. I presume a 1 year history on an ongoing basis, otherwise it will get too cluttered?

Right now there's no limit, but that's easy to add.  I think we'll have
to restrict it to less than 1 year, though, if we don't want it to get
cluttered on laptop-sized screens.

I'll report this as a bug and fix it before it becomes a problem.

> 
> Couple of other points:
>  * Can you remove OCEO and OEVP. These groups are just admin I think ;-)

Sure, that can be done.

>  * Is it possible to organise at all? So, group the Landing Teams together, the WGs together and the Platform teams together?

This needs quite a bit more work, but could be done.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guilherme Salgado [mailto:salgado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 08 September 2011 22:39
> To: James Westby
> Cc: Stephen Doel; linaro-infrastructure-stakeholders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Linaro-infrastructure-stakeholders] Infrastructure Stakeholders Meeting 2011-08-11
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This has just gone live; you can see it at 
>   
>   http://patches.linaro.org/teams
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:38 -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 17:32 -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:01 -0400, James Westby wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:28:56 +0100, "Stephen Doel" <stephen.doel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > Hi James,
> > > > > 
> > > > > At the Linaro Members Meeting on Monday there were a couple of requests for
> > > > > patches.linaro.org (which has been well received):
> > > > >  1. Can we include a monthly stacked column showing patches per team
> > > > 
> > > > This may be straightforward based on the data that is already available,
> > > > I'll ask Guilherme when he returns.
> > > 
> > > Yes, that can be done easily.  One concern someone had with this in the
> > > past was that this could promote comparisons between teams.
> > 
> > Although this can indeed be implemented easily, getting the monthly
> > patch counts for all teams is currently a very expensive process, so
> > it's probably not a good idea to show that on the frontpage without
> > reworking the underlying bits to fetch the data for all teams at once
> > instead of once per team, but that would take some time.
> > 
> > Given that, I suggest we add this report to a separate page until we
> > have the time to make it fast enough so that it can go on the frontpage.
> > Would that be ok?
> > 
> 

-- 
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part