linaro-infrastructure-stakeholders team mailing list archive

["Stephen Doel" <stephen.doel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Very good. I presume a 1 year history on an ongoing basis, otherwise it will get too cluttered?

Couple of other points:
 * Can you remove OCEO and OEVP. These groups are just admin I think ;-)
 * Is it possible to organise at all? So, group the Landing Teams together, the WGs together and the Platform teams together?

Stephen

-----Original Message-----
From: Guilherme Salgado [mailto:salgado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 08 September 2011 22:39
To: James Westby
Cc: Stephen Doel; linaro-infrastructure-stakeholders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Linaro-infrastructure-stakeholders] Infrastructure Stakeholders Meeting 2011-08-11

Hi,

This has just gone live; you can see it at 
  
  http://patches.linaro.org/teams

Cheers,

On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:38 -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 17:32 -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:01 -0400, James Westby wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:28:56 +0100, "Stephen Doel" <stephen.doel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Hi James,
> > > > 
> > > > At the Linaro Members Meeting on Monday there were a couple of requests for
> > > > patches.linaro.org (which has been well received):
> > > >  1. Can we include a monthly stacked column showing patches per team
> > > 
> > > This may be straightforward based on the data that is already available,
> > > I'll ask Guilherme when he returns.
> > 
> > Yes, that can be done easily.  One concern someone had with this in the
> > past was that this could promote comparisons between teams.
> 
> Although this can indeed be implemented easily, getting the monthly
> patch counts for all teams is currently a very expensive process, so
> it's probably not a good idea to show that on the frontpage without
> reworking the underlying bits to fetch the data for all teams at once
> instead of once per team, but that would take some time.
> 
> Given that, I suggest we add this report to a separate page until we
> have the time to make it fast enough so that it can go on the frontpage.
> Would that be ok?
> 

-- 
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>