canonical-ci-engineering team mailing list archive
-
canonical-ci-engineering team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01054
Re: objections to uservice_utils project on pypi?
On Apr 1, 2015 6:01 AM, "Celso Providelo" <celso.providelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> And we should, at least, think about the fact that the services (and
> the library) code is disposable. It's not meant to live forever, we
> still want to be able to drop one or more services off and re-write
> them entirely with some other technology if there is a need.
I need to really strongly disagree with this point. We're entering Year Two
of the temporary Google spreadsheet that was only meant to last a couple
months and is literally crumbling under the load we've put on it.
The old adage is really true, there is nothing quite so long lived as a
temporary solution.
Please take the time to do things properly instead of piling up crap that
just needs to get fixed later.
I think we as a company have maxed out our technical debt load and need to
pay it down sooner rather than later.
Follow ups
References