canonical-ci-engineering team mailing list archive
-
canonical-ci-engineering team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00297
Re: Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
In provision.sh, we use the bootstrap option everywhere, which blows
everything away and even reinstalls recovery. There were a few times in the
past where there was actually a change to the recovery and we wanted to
really make sure that we got the *whole* image.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Francis Ginther <
francis.ginther@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> /me was not aware of "--no-backup", but I also don't see it in the
> provision.sh script [2]. Psivaa is correct though, we shouldn't need
> it.
>
> Vila,
>
> I escalated the bug to critical now that I have a second vote. As I
> see it, I prefer ownership of phablet-tools remain with the phablet
> team as its users are broader then just CI. But we are a major
> stakeholder and should be able to have some leverage for getting in
> patches critical to our process (we ultimately have the same boss). We
> can always fork our own branch of phablet-tools if our concerns aren't
> being addressed (although I admit this often leads to a permanent
> rift).
>
> Francis
>
>
> [2] -
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-test-case-dev/ubuntu-test-cases/touch/view/head:/scripts/provision.sh
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Para Siva <para.siva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I am not seeing "--no-backup" option being applied along with
> phablet-flash
> > in the tests that Francis posted. I could have missed something in the
> > thread.
> > Was that a necessitiy in the UM configs? I would think not.
> >
> > On 07/11/13 14:14, Rick Fowler wrote:
> >
> > That sounds like what I've been seeing.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Francis Ginther
> > <francis.ginther@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> I put my maguro in a flash loop overnight, it got stuck on the 4th
> >> iteration. After tapping the power button, it's just sitting there
> >> telling me about the "Right edge". It does not show up under 'adb
> >> devices'.
> >>
> >> Francis
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Rick Fowler <rick.fowler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >> > They aren't dead, just unreachable via adb. Before I pop the battery
> or
> >> > reset them they are up and functional. Unplugging/plugging the usb
> >> > connector has no effect. I rarely need to reflash them.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Paul Larson <
> paul.larson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't think so, last I remember there was a fix for that put into
> >> >> phablet-tools to keep it from flashing concurrently.
> >> >>
> >> >> Francis, what state are the phones in when they die like this?
> >> >>
> >> >> On Nov 6, 2013 4:18 PM, "Andy Doan" <andy.doan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 11/06/2013 03:45 PM, Francis Ginther wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Paul,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Here is the contents of the flash job between the BEGIN and END
> >> >>>> markers, image_type=trusty-proposed. Another possible difference to
> >> >>>> keep in mind is that the phones are flashed right after the test
> >> >>>> completes, so they aren't sitting there idle before the flash
> starts.
> >> >>>> I also have a maguro here, I'll setup an overnight flash loop and
> see
> >> >>>> what happens.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Francis
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> # BEGIN
> >> >>>> # Install the latest requested image
> >> >>>> phablet-flash ubuntu-system --serial $ANDROID_SERIAL --channel
> >> >>>> $image_type --bootstrap
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> adb -s $ANDROID_SERIAL wait-for-device
> >> >>>> sleep 60
> >> >>>> # END
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Paul - Could this be related to concurrent use of FastBoot? I forgot
> >> >>> where things stood there, but I remember us having to use flocks
> >> >>> around
> >> >>> fastboot calls at Linaro.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
> >> >> Post to : canonical-ci-engineering@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
> >> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
> >> > Post to : canonical-ci-engineering@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
> >> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Francis Ginther
> >> Canonical - Ubuntu Engineering - Continuous Integration Team
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Francis Ginther
> Canonical - Ubuntu Engineering - Continuous Integration Team
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
> Post to : canonical-ci-engineering@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References
-
Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
From: Francis Ginther, 2013-11-06
-
Re: Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
From: Evan Dandrea, 2013-11-06
-
Re: Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
From: Andy Doan, 2013-11-06
-
Re: Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
From: Francis Ginther, 2013-11-06
-
Re: Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
From: Paul Larson, 2013-11-06
-
Re: Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
From: Francis Ginther, 2013-11-06
-
Re: Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
From: Andy Doan, 2013-11-06
-
Re: Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
From: Paul Larson, 2013-11-06
-
Re: Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
From: Rick Fowler, 2013-11-07
-
Re: Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
From: Francis Ginther, 2013-11-07
-
Re: Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
From: Rick Fowler, 2013-11-07
-
Re: Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
From: Para Siva, 2013-11-08
-
Re: Unstable upstream merger makos and maguros
From: Francis Ginther, 2013-11-08