canonical-ci-engineering team mailing list archive

[Alexander Sack <asac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Chris Johnston
<chris.johnston@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Alexander Sack <asac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Right,
>>
>> instead of touch_mir, call the saucy-proposed channel one "touch_saucy".
>
>
> Calling it touch_saucy is somewhat redundant. The naming scheme will already
> make it show up on the Saucy page of the dashboard, so it would be similar
> to calling it saucy-saucy.

OK, then lets stick with touch and have both saucy as well as trusty
builds show up there.

>>
>>
>> For now lets run default, install-on-boot and unity8 for touch_sf4p.
>>
>> Also would be good if we rename touch_mir -> to touch (tracking
>> devel-proposed) instead of creating a new test so we dont loose
>> history.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Paul Larson <paul.larson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Alex, following on to our discussion in IRC, I wanted to make sure
>> > everyone was in agreement with what we're proposing to do for saucy and
>> > trusty touch jobs going forward.
>> >
>> > == Current jobs we were running on Saucy ==
>> > touch_mir
>> > touch_ro (better described as surfaceflinger jobs, but renames are hard
>> > on
>> > the dashboard side)
>> > touch_custom
>> >
>> > == Proposed new jobs on Saucy ==
>> > touch_mir - saucy-proposed channel, we'd like to keep the same name just
>> > on
>> > Saucy if at all possible
>> >
>> > == Proposed new jobs on Trusty ==
>> > touch - Full run of tests on devel-proposed
>> > touch_sf4p - minimal run of TBD tests only on devel-proposed with mir
>> > turned
>> > off
>> > touch_custom - minimal run of the same tests we run now on custom jobs,
>> > but
>> > on trusty
>> >
>> > Andy, Joseph and I just had a hangout to sort out some of the technical
>> > details of what will be needed to do this, but we'd like to get
>> > confirmation
>> > that this is what you're expecting. The other thing I want to clarify,
>> > is
>> > which devices we run on. When we first started discussing whether to run
>> > on
>> > sf on irc, Ricardo was suggesting to just do it for tablets, but I think
>> > you
>> > are saying to do it on phones.  Do we run everything on phones only
>> > still?
>> > Do we need to add the tablets in for some tests again now?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Paul Larson
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
>> Post to     : canonical-ci-engineering@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Johnston <chris.johnston@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Software Engineer - Canonical Ltd.
> www.ubuntu.com