ubuntukylin-release-team team mailing list archive

["foss.freedom" <foss.freedom@xxxxxxxxx>]

on behalf of Ubuntu Budgie we have proposed a tasksel change
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tasksel/+bug/1652343).
Hopefully someone in the core-dev team can pick this up hopefully
early in the new year.

Jeremy is quite correct - until we see daily ISO's we (Ubuntu Budgie)
cannot as yet commit to any Alpha's

David (project lead)

On 23 December 2016 at 16:44, Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Walter Lapchynski <wxl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Speaking to Release Managers, it seems that the following are out for Alpha 1:
>>  * Kubuntu
>>  * Xubuntu
>>
>> The following are interested interested but the timing is bad for both RMs:
>>  * Lubuntu
>>  * Ubuntu MATE
>
> That leaves Ubuntu Kylin as the only flavor to have participated in
> Yakkety's Alphas to possibly be still in. Both Ubuntu Studio and
> Ubuntu GNOME participated in Yakkety Beta 1. I think Ubuntu Budgie
> might want in but they haven't been able to get the first official
> daily .iso built yet. [1]
>
> I don't think we've had a Community Milestone Coordinator (responsible
> for checklist tracking, release announcement, etc.) from any of those
> possibly-in-for-Alpha-1 flavors in the past. And I apologize but I'm
> not personally going to be able to be the Community Milestone
> Coordinator for this or other milestones.
>
> We first need a volunteer for that or there won't be an Alpha 1.
>
> Would delaying Alpha 1 a week change participation?
>
> If we skip Alpha 1, does it make sense to rename Alpha 2 to just 'Alpha'?
>
> [1] I think tasksel needs updating now but is there someone to make
> that change in the next few days?
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy Bicha