ooi team mailing list archive
-
ooi team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00001
Re: Moving away from nova-api binary
-
To:
ooi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Álvaro López García <aloga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:10:26 +0200
-
In-reply-to:
<20160804093521.GA4848@yuso.ifca.es>
-
Ironport-phdr:
9a23:1/RwhB1J1yhjtCsDsmDT+DRfVm0co7zxezQtwd8ZsegSKfad9pjvdHbS+e9qxAeQG96KsbQZ16GN7ujJYi8p2d65qncMcZhBBVcuqP49uEgeOvODElDxN/XwbiY3T4xoXV5h+GynYwAOQJ6tL2PbrnD61zMOABK3bVMzfbWvXNOOxJ/qn8mJuLTrKz1SgzS8Zb4gZD6Xli728vcsvI15N6wqwQHIqHYbM85fxGdvOE7B102kvpT4r9Zf9HFXvPMJ889bTb68e60lS7dYFD0qdWY4+J7Frx7GGKKL+HIGVVIyCQJFET/q5Qvx25655iL+seV08CiUNsSwULY1Uj2kqapwHky7wBwbPiI0pTmEwvd7i7hW9Uqs
-
User-agent:
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Hi,
now that we have some more maintainers in the mailint list, lets revisit
this topic.
What do you think about moving from nova-api into our own service?
On 04 Aug 2016 (11:35), Álvaro López García wrote:
> Dear ooiers,
>
> moving forward with ooi I think it is worth to stop using nova-api for
> running our interface, and create our own standalone binary and service
> (e.g. ooi-api or something like that).
>
> This way we would benefit from having our own configuration (i.e.
> nova.conf) and paste (i.e. api-paste.ini) files, remaining completely
> independent from the nova installation, so there would be no need to
> patch the installation whenever an update takes place. Moreover, this
> will ease the installation with devstack, thus we would be able to
> implement integration testing more easily with the OpenStack CI (and
> even run Rally jobs).
>
> If you agree we can start discussing all the different possibilities for
> implementing it.
>
> Cheers,
--
Álvaro López García aloga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Instituto de Física de Cantabria http://alvarolopez.github.io
Ed. Juan Jordá, Campus UC tel: (+34) 942 200 969
Avda. de los Castros s/n skype: aloga.csic
39005 Santander (SPAIN)
Follow ups
References