linaro-infrastructure-stakeholders team mailing list archive

[James Westby <james.westby@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Here are the notes from the meeting:

Attendees
---------

Fathi Boudra
David Zinman
James Westby
Mounir Bsaibes
Paul Larson

Actions from previous meeting
-----------------------------

james_w to work with mounir and michaelh to split up the ToolchainBuilds
spec to be more manageable: still TODO

Mounir raised that they have been working with Validation to transfer
the hardware to Cambridge and for him to still run it.

ACTION: Paul to update the documents about plan to move toolchain builds
to hardware in Cambridge with the current status.

Status of current projects
--------------------------

Patch tracking
  - Mounir wishes to have a group for IBM engineers. The plan was to
  have a LP group with those people. Mounir needs to have it private now
  though, and the tool doesn't support private groups. Mounir will
  continue to push this.

TestDrive
  - No comments on the status.

HardwarePacksV2
  - No comments on the status.

CI with LAVA
  - Paul is pleased with the progress on this. Weekly meetings with
  Deepak. Changes made to the scheduler to support this. Validation and
  Kernel will work on defining the tests that should be run. Kernel will
  work on test suites for general kernel features, and the LTs will work
  on tests for enablement.

Configure Gerrit
  - No comments on the status. 


Next projects
-------------

Status Tracking Enhancements:
  - Mounir asked what this project was covering. James answered that the
  work was being done to implement the roadmap views that were being
  mocked up in the email thread that Mounir is part of. Mounir asked if
  monthly milestone views were part of this. James said that it was not
  a dependency of the roadmap work, and so was not part of this project.

Proposed plan
-------------

No objects to summit.linaro.org work.

David asked for suggestions for a second project.

Mounir advocated for monthly views in status.linaro.org. He believes
that this is the most important project for him from those that he has
proposed.

This is the proposed second project for the queue. Are there any
counter-proposals, or comments on this?

Possible upcoming projects
--------------------------

Nobody had anything to raise at this time.

Thanks,

James


On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:34:17 -0400, David Zinman <david.zinman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Greetings.
> 
> Going forward I will be chairing the stakeholders meeting to take some load
> off James. Please bear with me as I ramp up for this task.
> 
> David Zinman
> Linaro Release Manager | Platform Project Manager
> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
> 
> ---
> 
>  Stakeholders Meeting Agenda September 1, 2011
> 
> Actions from last meeting:
> 
> * james_w to work with mounir and michaelh to split up the ToolchainBuilds
> spec to be more manageable: still TODO
> 
> Report on current projects:
> 
> * Patch Tracking – Done, one small item outstanding. No high priority bugs.
> This project will move to maintenance this week.
> 
> * TestDrive – Improved UI planned at Connect and implemented, released as
> part of 2011.08. No high priority bugs outstanding. This project will move
> to maintenance this week. Platforms will continue to drive adoption of the
> project.
> 
> * HardwarePacksv2 – Implementation available now. Dev Platform will drive
> the transition, doing the testing and switchover. This project will move to
> maintenance this week.
> 
> * CI with LAVA – several trees and defconfigs building and tested in LAVA
> daily. Work will continue as discussed on the techleads list currently, with
> Alexander owning the cross-team effort.
> 
> * Configure Gerrit - Android team has deployed the tool and is using it.
> Work on AOSP mirroring, and bringing up target specific kernel trees are
> ongoing.
> 
> * Next projects
> 
> - Private Hardware Pack Builds – work starting on that this week.
> 
> - Improvements to status.linaro.org – work starting on that this week.
> 
> * IS Queue
> 
> https://portal.admin.canonical.com/q/linaro
> 
> Proposed changes to the queues
> 
> * There are two free slots on the next projects queue.
> 
> * We propose adding "summit.linaro.org enhancements for Connect" to the next
> projects queue
> 
> * https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Specs/SummitEnhancements
> 
> * suggestions for second slot
> 
> * I don't think there is anything more urgent that the current
> 
> projects and next projects that would warrant dropping anything in progress.
> 
> * The IS Queue is still small, and nothing in there is very high priority
> 
> that I know of, so I don't think we need to re-prioritize there.
> 
> Possible upcoming projects
> 
> * Discussion of any projects that people want to propose in the near
> 
> future.
Non-text part: text/html
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~linaro-infrastructure-stakeholders
> Post to     : linaro-infrastructure-stakeholders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~linaro-infrastructure-stakeholders
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp