debcrafters-packages team mailing list archive

1. debcrafters-packages team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the debcrafters-packages mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• [Bug 2108966] Re: [SRU] Correct ThinkPad X9-15 Gen1 Touchpad Functionality, (continued)
  • [Bug 2108966] Re: [SRU] Correct ThinkPad X9-15 Gen1 Touchpad Functionality
    From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-05-28
  • [Bug 2108966] Re: [SRU] Correct ThinkPad X9-15 Gen1 Touchpad Functionality
    From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-05-28
  • [Bug 2108966] Re: [SRU] Correct ThinkPad X9-15 Gen1 Touchpad Functionality
    From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-05-28
• [Bug 2103489] Update Released
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2092438] Re: System fails to restart after install
  From: Sean Murphy, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2085815] Re: php8.1-odbc missing dependency to unixodbc-dev
  From: Athos Ribeiro, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2098515] Re: IPv6-only (single stack) instances configuring network over dhcp in initramfs will take a long time to boot due to loop in dhcpcd -4
  From: Christian Ehrhardt, 2025-05-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 2098515] Re: IPv6-only (single stack) instances configuring network over dhcp in initramfs will take a long time to boot due to loop in dhcpcd -4
  From: Renan Rodrigo, 2025-05-22
• [Bug 2098515] Re: IPv6-only (single stack) instances configuring network over dhcp in initramfs will take a long time to boot due to loop in dhcpcd -4
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-05-24
• [Bug 2098515] Re: IPv6-only (single stack) instances configuring network over dhcp in initramfs will take a long time to boot due to loop in dhcpcd -4
  From: Renan Rodrigo, 2025-05-26
• [Bug 2098515] Re: IPv6-only (single stack) instances configuring network over dhcp in initramfs will take a long time to boot due to loop in dhcpcd -4
  From: Renan Rodrigo, 2025-06-03
• [Bug 2098515] Re: IPv6-only (single stack) instances configuring network over dhcp in initramfs will take a long time to boot due to loop in dhcpcd -4
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-06-04
• [Bug 2098515] Re: IPv6-only (single stack) instances configuring network over dhcp in initramfs will take a long time to boot due to loop in dhcpcd -4
  From: Renan Rodrigo, 2025-06-04
• [Bug 2098515] Re: IPv6-only (single stack) instances configuring network over dhcp in initramfs will take a long time to boot due to loop in dhcpcd -4
  From: Renan Rodrigo, 2025-06-04
• [Bug 2098515] Re: IPv6-only (single stack) instances configuring network over dhcp in initramfs will take a long time to boot due to loop in dhcpcd -4
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-06-05
• [Bug 2052610] Re: value too great for base error with locale fr_FR
  From: Christian Ehrhardt, 2025-05-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 2052610] Re: value too great for base error with locale fr_FR
  From: Ural Tunaboyu, 2025-07-10
• [Bug 2111355] [NEW] package openssh-client 1:8.9p1-3ubuntu0.11 [modified: usr/bin/ssh] failed to install/upgrade: unable to make backup link of './usr/bin/ssh' before installing new version: Operation not permitted
  From: Natan Moreira Regis, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2111355] Re: package openssh-client 1:8.9p1-3ubuntu0.11 [modified: usr/bin/ssh] failed to install/upgrade: unable to make backup link of './usr/bin/ssh' before installing new version: Operation not permitted
  From: Natan Moreira Regis, 2025-07-01
• [Bug 2111355] Re: package openssh-client 1:8.9p1-3ubuntu0.11 [modified: usr/bin/ssh] failed to install/upgrade: unable to make backup link of './usr/bin/ssh' before installing new version: Operation not permitted
  From: Nick Rosbrook, 2025-07-01
• [Bug 2106017] Re: NetworkManager still adds default ipv6 route despite setting to ignore it
  From: Christian Ehrhardt, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Benjamin Drung, 2025-05-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Christian Ehrhardt, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Benjamin Drung, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-05-21
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Pushkar Kulkarni, 2025-06-17
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Pushkar Kulkarni, 2025-06-17
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Seth Arnold, 2025-06-17
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Benjamin Drung, 2025-06-27
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Sudhakar Verma, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Benjamin Drung, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Sudhakar Verma, 2025-08-08
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Benjamin Drung, 2025-08-11
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Sudhakar Verma, 2025-08-26
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Seth Arnold, 2025-09-02
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-09-02
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Benjamin Drung, 2025-09-02
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Christian Ehrhardt, 2025-09-03
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Sudhakar Verma, 2025-09-03
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-09-08
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-09-08
• [Bug 2031304] Re: [MIR] dracut
  From: Seth Arnold, 2025-09-12
• [Bug 2111342] [NEW] Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-05-22
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-05-22
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-05-22
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-05-22
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-05-22
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-05-22
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Alessandro Astone, 2025-05-23
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-06-02
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-06-02
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Christian Ehrhardt, 2025-06-02
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Christian Ehrhardt, 2025-06-02
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-06-03
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-06-03
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-06-03
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-06-03
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-06-16
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Nick Rosbrook, 2025-06-16
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-06-17
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-06-17
• [Bug 2111342] Re: Install time-daemon with NTS support by default
  From: Lukas Märdian, 2025-06-17
• [Bug 2095233] Re: tzdata 2025a release
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-05-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 2095233] Re: tzdata 2025a release
  From: Andreas Hasenack, 2025-06-12
• [Bug 2095233] Re: tzdata 2025a release
  From: Ural Tunaboyu, 2025-07-10
• [Bug 2109533] Re: papers crashed with SIGSEGV in PPS_IS_DOCUMENT()
  From: Simon Chopin, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2109817] Update Released
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 1566207] Re: /usr/bin/gnome-keyring-daemon:ERROR:daemon/dbus/gkd-secret-unlock.c:243:perform_next_unlock: assertion failed: (!self->current)
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 1987150] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon crashed with SIGABRT
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2106191] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon assert failure: ERROR:../daemon/dbus/gkd-secret-unlock.c:243:perform_next_unlock: assertion failed: (!self->current)
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2107534] Re: /usr/bin/gnome-keyring-daemon:ERROR:../daemon/dbus/gkd-secret-unlock.c:243:perform_next_unlock: assertion failed: (!self->current)
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-05-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 2107534] Re: /usr/bin/gnome-keyring-daemon:ERROR:../daemon/dbus/gkd-secret-unlock.c:243:perform_next_unlock: assertion failed: (!self->current)
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2107546] Re: /usr/bin/rhythmbox:11:rb_ext_db_cancel_requests:impl_deactivate:ffi_call_unix64:ffi_call_int:ffi_call
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-05-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 2107546] Re: /usr/bin/rhythmbox:11:rb_ext_db_cancel_requests:impl_deactivate:ffi_call_unix64:ffi_call_int:ffi_call
  From: Ubuntu QA Website, 2025-07-16
• [Bug 2111314] [NEW] /usr/libexec/localsearch-extractor-3:11:std::_Hashtable:std::unordered_map:NameToCharCode::lookup:Gfx8BitFont::Gfx8BitFont:std::make_unique
  From: errors.ubuntu.com bug bridge, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2111314] Re: /usr/libexec/localsearch-extractor-3:11:std::_Hashtable:std::unordered_map:NameToCharCode::lookup:Gfx8BitFont::Gfx8BitFont:std::make_unique
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2111314] Re: /usr/libexec/localsearch-extractor-3:11:std::_Hashtable:std::unordered_map:NameToCharCode::lookup:Gfx8BitFont::Gfx8BitFont:std::make_unique
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2102256] Re: papers crashed with SIGSEGV in std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::size()
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2111313] [NEW] /usr/bin/papers:11:std::__cxx11::basic_string:std::operator:UnicodeMap::match:UnicodeMapCache::getUnicodeMap:GlobalParams::getUnicodeMap
  From: errors.ubuntu.com bug bridge, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2111313] Re: /usr/bin/papers:11:std::__cxx11::basic_string:std::operator:UnicodeMap::match:UnicodeMapCache::getUnicodeMap:GlobalParams::getUnicodeMap
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2104299] Re: gsd-xsettings crashed with SIGSEGV in ???()
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2110945] Re: Xorg freeze
  From: Sudhakar Verma, 2025-05-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 2110945] Re: Xorg freeze
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2110945] Re: Xorg freeze
  From: Daniel van Vugt, 2025-05-26
• [Bug 2111286] [NEW] gtk menus crash with Wayland on Ubuntu 24.04.2
  From: Tina, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2111286] Re: gtk menus crash with Wayland on Ubuntu 24.04.2
  From: Tina, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2111284] [NEW] tlp
  From: Abdul basith k, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2111284] Re: tlp
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2111284] Re: tlp
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-07-20
• [Bug 2099703] Crash report cannot be processed
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2099703] ThreadStacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2099703] StacktraceSource.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2099703] Stacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2099703] gnome-font-viewer crashed with SIGSEGV in ???()
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2102256] ThreadStacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2102256] StacktraceSource.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2102256] Stacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2102256] papers crashed with SIGSEGV in UnicodeMap::match()
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Wesley Hershberger, 2025-05-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Wesley Hershberger, 2025-05-21
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-05-21
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Wesley Hershberger, 2025-05-21
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Ural Tunaboyu, 2025-07-10
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Wesley Hershberger, 2025-07-25
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Nick Rosbrook, 2025-08-20
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Nick Rosbrook, 2025-08-20
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2025-08-25
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2025-08-25
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Nick Rosbrook, 2025-08-27
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Wesley Hershberger, 2025-08-27
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-08-29
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-08-29
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Wesley Hershberger, 2025-08-29
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Wesley Hershberger, 2025-08-29
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Wesley Hershberger, 2025-09-01
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Wesley Hershberger, 2025-09-01
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Wesley Hershberger, 2025-09-01
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Wesley Hershberger, 2025-09-01
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Wesley Hershberger, 2025-09-01
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Andreas Hasenack, 2025-09-11
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-09-11
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2025-09-12
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-09-16
• [Bug 2072586] Re: Running "dconf update" with different umask affects the permissions of dconf databases in /etc/dconf/db/
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-09-16
• [Bug 2104299] ThreadStacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2104299] Stacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2104299] gsd-xsettings crashed with SIGSEGV in ???()
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2099915] Re: ibus-x11 assert failure: free(): invalid pointer
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2106744] Update Released
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2111265] [NEW] migrate to llvm 20.1.3 or newer
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate to llvm 20.1.3 or newer
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate to llvm 20.1.3 or newer
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-06-04
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate to llvm 20.1.3 or newer
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-06-04
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate to llvm 20.1.3 or newer
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-06-04
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate to llvm 20.1.3 or newer
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-06-08
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-08-05
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-08-06
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-08-06
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Andreas Hasenack, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Andreas Hasenack, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Andreas Hasenack, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Andreas Hasenack, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Andreas Hasenack, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Andreas Hasenack, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2111265] Autopkgtest regression report (mesa/25.0.7-0ubuntu0.25.04.2)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2025-08-07
• [Bug 2111265] Autopkgtest regression report (llvm-toolchain-20/1:20.1.2-0ubuntu1~24.04.1)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2025-08-08
• [Bug 2111265] Please test proposed package
  From: Andreas Hasenack, 2025-08-14
• [Bug 2111265] Autopkgtest regression report (llvm-toolchain-20/1:20.1.2-0ubuntu1~24.04.1)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2025-08-14
• [Bug 2111265] Autopkgtest regression report (llvm-toolchain-20/1:20.1.2-0ubuntu1~24.04.1)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2025-08-14
• [Bug 2111265] Autopkgtest regression report (llvm-toolchain-20/1:20.1.2-0ubuntu1~24.04.1)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2025-08-14
• [Bug 2111265] Autopkgtest regression report (llvm-toolchain-20/1:20.1.2-0ubuntu1~24.04.1)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2025-08-14
• [Bug 2111265] Autopkgtest regression report (llvm-toolchain-20/1:20.1.2-0ubuntu1~24.04.1)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2025-08-14
• [Bug 2111265] Autopkgtest regression report (llvm-toolchain-20/1:20.1.2-0ubuntu1~24.04.1)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2025-08-15
• [Bug 2111265] Autopkgtest regression report (llvm-toolchain-20/1:20.1.2-0ubuntu1~24.04.1)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2025-08-15
• [Bug 2111265] Autopkgtest regression report (llvm-toolchain-20/1:20.1.2-0ubuntu1~24.04.1)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2025-08-15
• [Bug 2111265] Autopkgtest regression report (llvm-toolchain-20/1:20.1.2-0ubuntu1~24.04.2)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2025-08-16
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-08-21
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Andreas Hasenack, 2025-08-21
• [Bug 2111265] Autopkgtest regression report (mesa/25.0.7-0ubuntu0.24.04.2)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2025-08-22
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Yong Mei Yong, 2025-08-28
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Julian Andres Klode, 2025-09-01
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-09-03
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-09-03
• [Bug 2111265] Update Released
  From: Julian Andres Klode, 2025-09-03
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2025-09-03
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-09-03
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-09-03
• [Bug 2111265] Re: migrate mesa to llvm 20.1.2 or newer
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-09-03
• [Bug 2099285] Crash report cannot be processed
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2099285] ThreadStacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2099285] StacktraceSource.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2099285] Stacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2099285] localsearch-extractor-3 crashed with SIGSEGV in UnicodeMap::match()
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2106191] ThreadStacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2106191] StacktraceSource.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2106191] Stacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2106191] gnome-keyring-daemon assert failure: ERROR:../daemon/dbus/gkd-secret-unlock.c:243:perform_next_unlock: assertion failed: (!self->current)
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2107535] Re: /usr/bin/baobab:11:baobab_location_list_volume_changed:baobab_location_list_mount_added:_baobab_location_list_mount_added_g_volume_monitor_mount_added:g_closure_invoke:signal_emit_unlocked_R
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-05-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 2107535] Re: /usr/bin/baobab:11:baobab_location_list_volume_changed:baobab_location_list_mount_added:_baobab_location_list_mount_added_g_volume_monitor_mount_added:g_closure_invoke:signal_emit_unlocked_R
  From: Fedon Kadifeli, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2107535] Re: /usr/bin/baobab:11:baobab_location_list_volume_changed:baobab_location_list_mount_added:_baobab_location_list_mount_added_g_volume_monitor_mount_added:g_closure_invoke:signal_emit_unlocked_R
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2025-05-20
• [Bug 2105980] Re: Ubuntu Release Upgrade "package plymouth 24.004.60-1ubuntu7.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed plymouth package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1"
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 2105980] Re: Ubuntu Release Upgrade "package plymouth 24.004.60-1ubuntu7.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed plymouth package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1"
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-06-15
• [Bug 2105980] Re: Ubuntu Release Upgrade "package plymouth 24.004.60-1ubuntu7.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed plymouth package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1"
  From: Simon Poirier, 2025-06-16
• [Bug 2109915] Re: package sudo 1.9.15p5-3ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2106072] Re: package tzdata 2025b-0ubuntu0.20.04 failed to install/upgrade: installed tzdata package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 2106072] Re: package tzdata 2025b-0ubuntu0.20.04 failed to install/upgrade: installed tzdata package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2025-07-19
• [Bug 2106707] Re: 7.1-3build2 failed to install/upgrade
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• [Bug 2104378] Re: package systemd 249.11-0ubuntu3.12 failed to install/upgrade: installed systemd package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 127
  From: Apport retracing service, 2025-05-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 2104378] Re: package systemd 249.11-0ubuntu3.12 failed to install/upgrade: installed systemd package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 127
  From: Nick Rosbrook, 2025-05-23

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status