debcrafters-packages team mailing list archive
-
debcrafters-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #09176
[Bug 2124969] Re: lintian ftbfs in questing archive rebuild
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * lintian is FTBFS since the rollout of some rust coreutils changes, because some tests are broken.
+ * This affect our ability to update it for possible future SRUs.
+
+ [ Test Plan ]
+
+ * Building the package shouldn't fail, in particular during the testing
+ step.
+
+ [ Where problems could occur ]
+
+ * As lintian is usually part of some CI and/or developer tooling, we
+ can always expect regressions in those areas, but that's unlikely that
+ lintian is going to break stuff for regular non-developer Ubuntu users.
+
+
+ [ Other Info ]
+
+ * This is being tracked mainly in that other SRU bug:
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/2127769
+
+ Original description:
+
The package fails to build in the recent archive rebuild
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20250910-questing-questing.html
Test Summary Report
-------------------
debian/test-out/eval/checks/binaries/architecture/binaries-misplaced/generic.t (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 1 Failed: 1)
- Failed test: 1
- Non-zero exit status: 1
+ Failed test: 1
+ Non-zero exit status: 1
debian/test-out/eval/checks/binaries/location/binaries-misplaced/generic.t (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 1 Failed: 1)
- Failed test: 1
- Non-zero exit status: 1
+ Failed test: 1
+ Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=1503, Tests=64208, 1934 wallclock secs ( 8.69 usr 7.17 sys + 5745.63 cusr 1724.78 csys = 7486.27 CPU)
Result: FAIL
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Debcrafters packages, which is subscribed to lintian in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2124969
Title:
lintian ftbfs in questing archive rebuild
Status in lintian package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Status in lintian source package in Questing:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
[ Impact ]
* lintian is FTBFS since the rollout of some rust coreutils changes, because some tests are broken.
* This affect our ability to update it for possible future SRUs.
[ Test Plan ]
* Building the package shouldn't fail, in particular during the
testing step.
[ Where problems could occur ]
* As lintian is usually part of some CI and/or developer tooling, we
can always expect regressions in those areas, but that's unlikely that
lintian is going to break stuff for regular non-developer Ubuntu
users.
[ Other Info ]
* This is being tracked mainly in that other SRU bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/2127769
Original description:
The package fails to build in the recent archive rebuild
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20250910-questing-questing.html
Test Summary Report
-------------------
debian/test-out/eval/checks/binaries/architecture/binaries-misplaced/generic.t (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 1 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 1
Non-zero exit status: 1
debian/test-out/eval/checks/binaries/location/binaries-misplaced/generic.t (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 1 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 1
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=1503, Tests=64208, 1934 wallclock secs ( 8.69 usr 7.17 sys + 5745.63 cusr 1724.78 csys = 7486.27 CPU)
Result: FAIL
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/2124969/+subscriptions
References