canonical-ci-engineering team mailing list archive

[Evan Dandrea <evan.dandrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 9 December 2014 at 12:04, Martin Pitt <martin.pitt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Evan Dandrea [2014-12-09 11:55 +0000]:
>> Not running them may require some modification as well, as adt may
>> just ignore unknown fields.
>
> adt-run itself doesn't care at all about the Classes: field. You call
> adt-run with the testbed you want to run a test in, so there is
> nothing that adt-run could do about it at this level.
>
> Classes: is in the spec for the purpose of the thing that calls
> adt-run, i. e. somewhere between britney and the airline.

Sorry, I meant to imply that if we feed these tests to
proposed-migration or directly to the bootstack test runner right now,
something above the level of adt may ignore it.