canonical-ci-engineering team mailing list archive
-
canonical-ci-engineering team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00507
Re: CI Engine Project
The argument that I was going to make in support of separate projects:
The separation of projects should lead to separation of concerns and
better APIs. But that requires a stable API first and we won't be
there for a while. The other arguments I had have been resolved or
overcome by the discussion here. So, while I was in favor of this
originally, now is not the time for splitting (if ever).
Francis
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Evan Dandrea
<evan.dandrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12 December 2013 05:32, Andy Doan <andy.doan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I think that's a bit of silo thinking. eg, We all need to care about what's
>> going into the image-builder and at least be cognizant of the fact that
>> there are changes going into it.
>
> +1
>
> It also means less work for the single command deployment and CI of CI.
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
> Post to : canonical-ci-engineering@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
Francis Ginther
Canonical - Ubuntu Engineering - Continuous Integration Team
References