canonical-ci-engineering team mailing list archive

[Paul Larson <paul.larson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We still can't fully get rid of panda until it's no longer supported. As
long as that's the case, we'll need to support panda *and* calxeda since
they don't use the same kernel. There's also still an ArmadaXP board
lingering around (yes, Marvell Armada), which is still supported on at
least Precise. So until that's EOL in 2017, we'll need it around to do
kernel SRUs.


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Para Siva <para.siva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 23/10/13 01:56, Evan Dandrea wrote:
>
>> For example, why do we still have a ton of pandas when we now have the
>> Calxeda? Are they wired up to anything? Can we bin them?
>>
>
> We are still using one panda (qa-panda-2) for quantl kernel SRU in m-o.
> Calxeda has not been setup for that yet. May be we could do that this cycle.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~**canonical-ci-engineering<https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering>
> Post to     : canonical-ci-engineering@**lists.launchpad.net<canonical-ci-engineering@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~**canonical-ci-engineering<https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering>
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/**ListHelp<https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>