canonical-ci-engineering team mailing list archive

[Pete Woods <pete.woods@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Has his conversation now reduced into a debate about why we have DNS
records?
On 5 Oct 2013 22:28, "Michał Sawicz" <michal.sawicz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 05.10.2013 23:21, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>
>> I apparently can't access those bugs so can't really see what you
>> reported, note that for the case of snakefruit and nusakan, a DNS record
>> wouldn't have helped since it's the IS maintained firewalls that are the
>> main problem (those machines have very restricted network access so any
>> change in IP address needs to be coordinated with IS so that the
>> firewalls can be updated).
>>
>
> They're private, I've subscribed you to the first one. And I understand
> the problem with accessing one from the other - and it's not about that.
> It's about being able to reference and access those services by name, and
> not just by IP, so that we can move the name in case of such migrations,
> instead of having to update the IPs everywhere they've been stored by now,
> and just letting people know the new IP address and asking them to remember
> it "locally".
>
> --
> Michał (Saviq) Sawicz <michal.sawicz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Canonical Services Ltd.
>
> --
> Ubuntu-engineering mailing list
> Ubuntu-engineering@lists.**canonical.com<Ubuntu-engineering@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.canonical.com/**
> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-**engineering<https://lists.canonical.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-engineering>
>